So, after four weeks of patience and fortitude, the day of reckoning arrived and it was time to bottle my first batch of homebrew. This was a lot easier that I initially imagined it was going to be. In fact, I was planning on a couple hour process and it ended up taking less than an hour once we actually got the brew flowing between fermenter and bottling bucket. But I skip ahead.
First thing was to prep the bottles which involved much cleaning and sterilizing. I ended up doing most of this Friday evening just to save time today and also to give everyone a nice contact high as we watched The Fellowship of the Ring. Removing adhesive from old Bud Light bottles is not necessarily the most fun way to spend the evening, but it worked out in the long run as I had to purchase only one case of new beer bottles after getting the Bud bottles from a friend at work. After de-labeling, the bottles went into the dishwasher for a cleaning and sterilization. This morning I then yanked them out, filled the sink with water and bleach and resterilized them just to be on the safe side. At the same time I also got the tubing, siphon, and bottling bucket filled with the bleach/water mixture so they could get all nice and sterile as well.
The only major snag I ran into in all this prep work was with the priming sugar. When the beer comes out of the fermenter it's not carbonated. All the nice gas that was created during the fermentation process went right out the airlock. So, you have to add more sugar into the beer as you bottle it so that it will ferment as in conditions in the bottle. I thought I had read that you could use plain sugar or a mixture of sugar and corn syrup for this priming sugar, and I thought to myself, "Cool, no need to buy priming sugar. I've got the supplies at home already". Wrong.
The priming sugar actually has to be finely processed corn sugar, which I don't have laying around the house and I don't think I could buy anywhere within a 30 mile radius of home. But fortune smiles every now and again upon us and we get lucky. Last week I purchased the ingredients for my next batch of homebrew, and I got a extract kit this time rather than an all grain kit. And lo and behold in the box of ingredients is a bag of priming sugar. Now I just have to remember to purchase another bag of priming sugar so this doesn't happen again with the next batch.
So, priming sugar goes into boiling water for five minutes. Boiling water goes into the bottling bucket, and then we begin siphoning the beer from the fermenter to the bottler. Now this is where I'm thankful that I spent the little bit extra for my brewing equipment. Part of the package is what's called the Autosiphon. I'm used to starting a siphon by inserting tubing into bucket, start sucking on end of tubing, get a mouthful of whatever you're trying to siphon and then rapidly shoving the tubing into your container to catch the rest. Not with this baby. Insert the tube into the bucket, pump once or twice on the handle, and you've got a neat, clean siphon going between buckets.
After that it was really just a matter of attaching the tubing and filling the bottles with the wand. I went with standard beer bottles and caps this time, mostly because I'm poor. I would like to use self capping bottles in the future. The nice ones with the attached locking stopper that seals down tightly and can be reused over and over without a capper. But at $20 for a box of 12, it's not happening anytime soon. I did get two large liter bottles, though, that have the self stopper just to try them out and make sure this is the way I want to go in the future. I jokingly refer to these at my "40s" and am seriously considering wrapping them in brown paper bags before bringing them to the table to serve from.'
After that it was the 12 oz. bottles. I ended up with total of 38 bottles of beer plus the two large bottles. A little short of what I expected, but the dross at the bottom of the bucket looked a little nasty and I didn't really want to have that sitting in the bottom of my homebrew. So, we go a little short on the beer, but hopefully it's that much better. Now I'm down to another week of waiting till I can crack one open and see how the finished product turns out. Hopefully no bottles explode in the mean time.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Faith founded on Fact
This morning was my first class in a thirteen week series on apologetics that I'm teaching to the senior high at my church. I have to admit that I was fairly nervous seeing as how it's been almost two years since the last time that I had a full series of lessons to teach for which I was creating my own curriculum. However, the kids seemed to take to the subject matter, and the adult response was good as well. So, I'm hoping that bodes well for the coming weeks (and by God's grace it will).
But that's not actually what I want to post about.
As I was going through my lesson this morning I got to a section where I was describing the uses of apologetics. One of those was that it was a tool that can be used to strengthen and encourage believers in their faith. Yes, we can use it to try to convince others, or to refute an argument, but we, as Christians, can strengthen our own positions so that the doubt and fear that can assail us need no longer be a concern. To prove this point to the teens I asked them, somewhat off the cuff, "How many of you have ever secretly doubted that the Bible is not really God's Word?" I intended this as a lead in to show that we don't have to have these doubts because we can look at archeology and modern scholarship and see that it is consistent with Scripture and that it can prove that whole of Scripture is true.
The surprise for me came when everyone in the class raised their hand. Adults, teens, me as well. And it really hit home that the church has neglected apologetics to the point that even dedicated, adult Christians can have moments of doubt in their faith as to the veracity of Scripture. So for my own edification, and for the edification of anyone who happens to read this that has ever had their doubts about the Bible being God's Word, lets list out some reasons to have faith in it.
But that's not actually what I want to post about.
As I was going through my lesson this morning I got to a section where I was describing the uses of apologetics. One of those was that it was a tool that can be used to strengthen and encourage believers in their faith. Yes, we can use it to try to convince others, or to refute an argument, but we, as Christians, can strengthen our own positions so that the doubt and fear that can assail us need no longer be a concern. To prove this point to the teens I asked them, somewhat off the cuff, "How many of you have ever secretly doubted that the Bible is not really God's Word?" I intended this as a lead in to show that we don't have to have these doubts because we can look at archeology and modern scholarship and see that it is consistent with Scripture and that it can prove that whole of Scripture is true.
The surprise for me came when everyone in the class raised their hand. Adults, teens, me as well. And it really hit home that the church has neglected apologetics to the point that even dedicated, adult Christians can have moments of doubt in their faith as to the veracity of Scripture. So for my own edification, and for the edification of anyone who happens to read this that has ever had their doubts about the Bible being God's Word, lets list out some reasons to have faith in it.
- The Bible was written by a total of 40 authors over a space of approximately 1600 years in three different languages on three different continents by men that had differing levels of education and in vastly different circumstances. In spite of this it has an internal message that is more consistent than books written by individual authors over the space of a single lifetime. To illustrate this further lets do a little thought experiment. Pick a subject, any subject, as long as people have been writing about it for the last, lets say, 500 years. For our sake lets use human morality. Now take any 40 authors on this subject and collect their writings into one work. Now go through and see how many inconsistencies there are in message and theme.
- The Bible has more manuscript evidence to support the consistency of its message and the accuracy of our modern translations than any other ten works from antiquity combined. For example:
- The works of Aristotle: 7 available manuscripts with the oldest being 1400 years removed from the original composition date.
- Plato's Tetralogies: 49 available manuscripts with the oldest being 1300 years removed from the original composition date.
- Homer's Illiad: Approximately 2200 manuscripts with the oldest being 500 years removed from the original composition date.
- The New Testament: 5600+ manuscripts available with the oldest being only 90 years removed from the original composition date.
- The Bible has the most accurate transcription rate of any work from antiquity. As an example lets compare a more recent copy of Isaiah 53 to a copy that came from the Dead Sea Scrolls
- Of 166 words, only 17 letters are in question
- Of these: 10 are from differences in spelling and 4 are from differences in conjugation that don't affect the meaning of the passage.
- The remaining three letters come from the addition of the word light in verse 11 which does not change the meaning of the passage.
- The rest of the Old Testament holds up just as well in comparison with the percentage of actual changes to the manuscript that could have affected the meaning of a passage being somewhere in the range of .01%.
Monday, March 1, 2010
A Quick Update
This isn't going to be a very long post tonight, mainly because I've been up since 4:15 this morning and I'm tired. But I did want to get on long enough to say that beer is fermenting properly. Yesterday we felt around the lid and you could peel definite gas pushing outward on it, and today the bubbler on top began to gurgle away as gas began to be released from the brew.
So, one definite plus in that I did not kill the yeast or make an unfermentable wort. Now, I still have to wait five weeks and five days before I can see if it turned out, and another week after that to see if it's drinkable.
Patience.
So, one definite plus in that I did not kill the yeast or make an unfermentable wort. Now, I still have to wait five weeks and five days before I can see if it turned out, and another week after that to see if it's drinkable.
Patience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)